AI Image Generation & IP: My Search for an Ethical Visual

AI Image Generation & IP: My Search for an Ethical Visual

Introduction

The promise of AI image generation is intoxicating for any business leader or content creator: the ability to conjure a perfect, bespoke visual from a simple text prompt. It democratizes design, empowers storytelling, and solves a universal pain point, finding the right image to illustrate a complex idea. But this powerful tool is shrouded in a thick fog of ethical and legal ambiguity, particularly around intellectual property.

I recently experienced this tension firsthand. I crafted a LinkedIn post discussing a significant development: the Japanese government’s warning to OpenAI about IP infringement concerns. To visually anchor this nuanced topic, I used an AI-generated image in a general anime style. The irony was swift and public. The comments section quickly filled with accusations of hypocrisy I was being condemned for the very act I was denouncing.

This wasn’t just a social media misstep; it was a microcosm of the confusion every established company faces when integrating new AI solutions. It forced me on a quest, not just for a better image, but for a clearer, more ethical framework for using this technology. My journey from accusation to insight reveals the critical balancing act between practical utility and respectful innovation and offers a pragmatic path forward for businesses navigating this new landscape.

The Right Reasons to Use AI Imagery

Let’s be clear: the drive to use AI-generated visuals isn’t born from a desire to cut corners or devalue artistry. For professionals and established businesses, it’s a pragmatic solution to a critical and perennial challenge: the need for high-quality, specific, and engaging visual content.

Before AI, our options were limited. We could scour stock photo sites, often settling for generic, inauthentic images that barely resonated with any topic. We could hire a designer and graphic artist for every single post, article, or presentation, a process that is often prohibitively expensive and time-consuming for the rapid pace of modern communication. Or, we could go without, leaving our valuable insights visually unadorned and less impactful.

AI image generation shatters these limitations. It empowers someone like me, who cannot draw a convincing stick figure, to create a visual that accurately illustrates a complex point about a futuristic concept for a keynote, or a data-driven insight for a client report. It’s about effective communication, not artistic pretension.

This is the core of the value we help businesses unlock at System in Motion. It’s not about replacing human creativity; it’s about augmenting human capability. It’s about providing the tools for non-technical and non-artistic teams to express their ideas with clarity and impact, ensuring that their message is not just heard, but also seen and understood. This is true AI mastery: using technology as a strategic lever to overcome operational hurdles and communicate with greater power and precision.

Respecting the Craft and the Creators

Before we delve into the practicalities, a crucial distinction must be made—one that separates thoughtful adoption from reckless appropriation. My use of AI-generated imagery does not make me an artist, nor does it diminish my profound respect for those who are.

I hold a deep admiration for true artistic mastery. The work of visionaries like Hayao Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli isn’t just entertainment; it’s a testament to decades of honed craft, unique vision, and profound cultural expression. This respect informed a clear ethical boundary: I have never, and would never, endorse using AI to mass-replicate a specific protected style for commercial gain or to create derivative works that plagiarize a unique artistic voice. The recent trend of generating entire films in the “style of Ghibli” is a concerning example of this very overreach, blurring the line between inspiration and infringement.

This isn’t just a personal preference; it’s a core principle of responsible AI integration. For established companies, the goal is not to become something you’re not, but to enhance what you already do so well. It’s about using technology to solve your specific business problems with trust and quality at the forefront, not to indiscriminately disrupt creative industries. Using a general aesthetic to illustrate a point is a tool for communication; systematically replicating a recognizable style is an ethical misstep. Understanding this difference is the first step toward leadership in the new AI-powered landscape.

My Search for an Ethical Visual

Motivated by the feedback on my initial post and my own desire to align action with principle, I embarked on a deliberate quest for my follow-up article. This time, I was determined to use a legitimate piece of art from a real artist, properly attributed, to illustrate the growing demands from Japanese IP holders for their work to be excluded from AI training sets. The journey, however, revealed the immense practical challenges that businesses face when navigating this new ethical terrain.

My process was methodical:

1. Visual concept: I had a clear idea in my mind about the visual elements to include to represent the Japanese artists ready to fight to protect their intellectual property against the AI Model providers.

2. The Web Search: I began with a search across major image platforms and search engines. My goal was to find an image that matched my visual idea. The results were a sea of irrelevance. Nothing captured the specific image I wanted to conjure.

3. The Royalty-Free Platforms: Next, I turned to dedicated royalty-free and Creative Commons archives. While these are excellent resources for certain types of content, they failed to provide the modern, concept-driven, and stylistically coherent artwork required for this very specific topic.

4. The Hybrid Validation Method: Faced with these dead ends, I generated a new image with the prompt: “A very large robot is ready to destroy a Japanese village. Three samurais are ready to face the robot and defend the village.” Within seconds, I had the perfect visual representation of my article’s thesis.

5. Validation: I ran the AI-generated image through a reverse image search to answer the paramount question: does it infringe on a known artist’s existing work? The results were revealing. The image was not a copy. It was a novel composition. However, the search did return a gallery of visually similar images. To my surprise, the majority were themselves AI-generated, with others being unlicensed fan art or copyrighted character screenshots. This highlighted a chaotic digital ecosystem where finding attributable, original art for a specific modern concept has become nearly impossible.

This exercise wasn’t just about finding a picture; it was a real-world case study in the challenges of ethical AI usage. It demonstrated that while the intention to do the right thing is paramount, the practical tools and resources for doing so easily are not yet mature. This gap is precisely why businesses need clear internal policies and expert guidance to navigate this space effectively, turning ethical intention into practical, compliant action.

Key Takeaways for Businesses Navigating AI Visuals

My experience wasn’t just a personal lesson; it was a live stress test of the challenges our clients face. The confusion around AI-generated content isn’t a niche issue, it’s a fundamental business integration challenge. For established companies looking to adopt AI responsibly, this translates into a need for clear frameworks and practical policies.

Here is an actionable guidance to help your organization navigate this new terrain with confidence and integrity:

1. Implement a Due Diligence Check: Treat every AI-generated image as a potential risk until proven otherwise. Mandate a reverse image search as a standard, non-negotiable step in your content creation workflow. This is a basic but powerful compliance measure to mitigate the risk of accidental infringement before publication.

2. Educate Your Teams on “Style” vs. “Infringement”: This is the crucial legal and ethical distinction. Foster internal literacy on the difference between generating an image “in the style of anime” (a broad genre) and generating an image of a specific copyrighted character or directly replicating an artist’s unique, signature technique. This empowers your teams to use the tool creatively without overstepping.

3. Prioritize Ethical Sourcing, When Possible: The intent matters. Encourage teams to first seek out properly licensed works or commission human artists for high-visibility, flagship projects. This demonstrates a commitment to quality and respect for creative industries, aligning your brand with strong values.

4. Develop a Clear Internal AI Policy: Ad-hoc decisions lead to risk. The most critical step is to create a living document that outlines acceptable use cases, mandatory validation steps, and ethical guidelines for all AI-generated content (visual, textual, or code). This provides clarity, ensures consistency across teams, and protects your company.

It’s not just about providing training to your teams on how to use the latest AI tools but about providing the strategic framework for using them correctly, safely, and effectively within the context of an established company.

Conclusion

The journey from a controversial LinkedIn post to a validated, AI-generated image is more than a personal anecdote; it’s a parable for the modern business landscape. The integration of artificial intelligence is not a simple plug-and-play operation. It is a complex adoption curve fraught with ethical dilemmas, practical hurdles, and a pressing need for clear governance.

The core takeaway is this: the future of AI in business is not about choosing sides between technological progress and artistic integrity. That is a false dichotomy. The future is about integration, the thoughtful, strategic, and principled weaving of powerful new tools into the fabric of your established operations. It’s about mastering the technology without being mastered by its ambiguities.

The legal and ethical landscapes will continue to evolve, perhaps rapidly. What will not change is the competitive advantage held by companies that choose to be proactive rather than reactive. Organizations that invest in education, establish clear policies, and empower their teams with practical frameworks will not only avoid costly missteps but will also unlock AI’s true potential: to enhance human creativity, streamline communication, and drive transformation with confidence.

The goal is not to avoid AI for fear of missteps. The goal is to master it with the expert guidance and strategic understanding needed to wield it powerfully, ethically, and correctly.

We are Here to Empower

At System in Motion, we are on a mission to empower as many knowledge workers as possible. To start or continue your GenAI journey.